Thread: Wins/Losses and Titles is the way forward...
View Single Post
Old 09-30-2013, 02:53 AM   #8
DAMN iNATOR
RIP SABU
 
DAMN iNATOR's Avatar
 
Posts: 35,547
DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)DAMN iNATOR makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by scatterbrain28 View Post
In the Attitude era, and probably before that, they used to build guys up through the mid-card have them win the IC/US title then win the WWF title. After he had a couple of runs with the big belt, then it was time to put other guys over. That happened until Brock Lesnar won the WWF title after a few months of being there. Now they rush the process and if they put the IC/US belt on you, Vince says "Hey, but this jobber over." He either puts too much faith in them or kills their push when they don't connect with the audience.
Let's not forget the more recent example of rushing to push a new guy in WWE: Sheamus. He debuted on ECW in late June, 2009, within months was transferred to RAW, given a title shot for the WWE Championship vs. Cena at TLC in December of that year where he beat Cena in a Tables match. I'm no great fan of Cena, all the veteran posters here know I make no secret of that. But was it really necessary at that point in time to rip the title away from Cena just because they wanted this fresh, young Irish "lad" to get more attention? I think not.
DAMN iNATOR is offline   Reply With Quote