Thread: Is someone truely retired if they continue to bump?
View Single Post
Old 10-24-2013, 04:35 PM   #16
Swiss Ultimate
Amazon Affiliate
 
Swiss Ultimate's Avatar
 
Posts: 42,694
Swiss Ultimate makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Swiss Ultimate makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Swiss Ultimate makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Swiss Ultimate makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Swiss Ultimate makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Swiss Ultimate makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Swiss Ultimate makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Swiss Ultimate makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Swiss Ultimate makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Swiss Ultimate makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Swiss Ultimate makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Swiss Ultimate makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Swiss Ultimate makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xero View Post
This is an argument I've heard for a while now and I thought I'd bring it to the forums.

Basically, the argument is that if you retire and take any kind of true bump after that retirement, you've already broken that retirement, whether you wrestle or not.

The main example being Shawn Michaels. No, he hasn't wrestled a match since retiring, but he's reffed, been apart of angles and has had some offense. Is he truely retired or has he already broken it?

And in general, what do you think defines retirement? No more matches? No more bumps? No more storyline involvement at all?

Discuss.
I'm semi-retired.
Swiss Ultimate is offline   Reply With Quote