View Single Post
Old 10-28-2013, 09:19 PM   #46
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Why can't the commentators just concede that when a Money in the Bank Winner cashes in that it's the smart thing to do? Then they can talk about the chances of the former champion getting their title back in fair competition.

I think it would be more exciting if the Money in the Bank contract was amended so that if the winner cashes in and becomes champion, the person they cash in on doesn't get their immediate title rematch. Would create more of a chase for face champions and such.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote