View Single Post
Old 10-28-2013, 08:39 PM   #2
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,571
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tedious View Post
Awesome match, but way to shit on the MITB concept. WTF the announcers making it out like Cena had a choice in the matter?
I dunno. Of all the Money in the Bank Winners, Sandow is the only one that I've thought a loss would fit. His whole character is that he's meant to be smarter than everyone else. Give him a shot whenever he wants it and he should be unstoppable. That's why him not getting it done shows a humanity to Sandow that an obvious win wouldn't have achieved.

Now how can Sandow talk about how he's smarter than everyone? He got his clear shot and he missed. Humble pie is coming Sandow's way, and he's either going to mature or he's going to become more dangerous -- either way, it's character evolution.

Whereas Sandow winning would just be him coming out and talking about the same things he has talked about since he has arrived.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote