Quote:
Originally Posted by Noid
I dunno. Of all the Money in the Bank Winners, Sandow is the only one that I've thought a loss would fit. His whole character is that he's meant to be smarter than everyone else. Give him a shot whenever he wants it and he should be unstoppable. That's why him not getting it done shows a humanity to Sandow that an obvious win wouldn't have achieved.
Now how can Sandow talk about how he's smarter than everyone? He got his clear shot and he missed. Humble pie is coming Sandow's way, and he's either going to mature or he's going to become more dangerous -- either way, it's character evolution.
Whereas Sandow winning would just be him coming out and talking about the same things he has talked about since he has arrived.
|
I sorta agree, but I feel like Money in the Bank should be used for something more than just character development.