Thread: Priemiership draft
View Single Post
Old 06-28-2004, 11:13 PM   #41
toxic rooster
adjective noun
 
toxic rooster's Avatar
 
Posts: 30,419
toxic rooster makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)toxic rooster makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)toxic rooster makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)toxic rooster makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)toxic rooster makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)toxic rooster makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)toxic rooster makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)toxic rooster makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)toxic rooster makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)toxic rooster makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)toxic rooster makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)toxic rooster makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)toxic rooster makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Precisely.

That's where a salary cap (like in Aussie football) becomes useful, because it limits the amount that a team can spend on their players, and ensures that they don't spend beyond their means and face administration etc.

If you wanted to even out the competitions, use a salary cap and ROOKIE AND FREE AGENT draft. Not something like Doink is suggesting, where teams are in a lottery as to the players that they get.
toxic rooster is offline