View Single Post
Old 11-16-2013, 07:51 PM   #61
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The One View Post
I've laid out both historic context for my argument, and explained how future cash flows would be effected by the streak ending...and your rebuttal was to basically say: no that's not true because it goes against my position.
No. I've explained how your "historical context" is invalid and how no future cash flows would be hurt by the streak ending with a loss. Even how it would be beneficial money-wise to make such a huge moment that wrestling hasn't seen in decades. Just the fact that you claim I'm only saying "that's not true because it does against my position" is pretty ironic after that "I don't know how much Desty has to scream this message before you all seem to understand it" comment. Kinda makes it seem like you're the one plugging your ears as to not hear any opposing theories.

Seriously. Even if you think I'm wrong, how the hell do you get "That's not true because it goes against my position" unless you're completely ignoring what I'm saying?
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote