|
WWE Good:
History and prestige, allowing them to make moments feel important and significant.
High level production values.
Very deep talent roster.
WWE Bad:
Excessive pandering to demographics that are not me.
Formulaic matches.
Lack of chemistry between commentators.
Ignoring the past, or outright lying about it.
TNA Good:
High percentage of entertaining matches.
More mature tone.
Less scripted nature of promos and commentary.
TNA Bad:
Small arenas, without enough hardcore fans, mean the crowd reactions never create an epic atmosphere (outside of England).
Misuse of certain longtime members of the roster.
|