Quote:
Originally Posted by Gorgeous Dale Newstead
Given that since the invasion both of them have had the book along with Vince, and there has been constant colossal fuckups and bad booking, I don't see how this is out of the realm of possibility to you.
|
I've taken it into consideration, trust me.
Guys like Lesnar, Orton, Guerrero, Benoit, RVD, Angle, CM Punk, etc., etc., could have and should have been pushed more wisely, but weren't.
As result - all of the aforementioned achieved superstardom, but could have been even bigger in the WWE. I get that.
With Daniel Bryan however, it just seems like WAY too obvious of a thing. Like they would almost have to be borderline down-syndrome retarded to NOT capitalize on this........or NOT see what's going on.
Vince McMahon, etc. have made stupid decisions lots of times, but he/they are also very successful businessmen. I just can't see them missing something so blatantly obvious here.
Again though - time will tell.
Perhaps the WWE were pushing Bryan 'under the rug' a little to see how fans would react (i.e. to see if the fans were genuine in wanting to see Bryan as a superstar). A "litmus" test if you will.
If the fans weren't truly behind Bryan, they would've forgotten about him for the most part (as they did with Zack Ryder).