Quote:
Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan
No. You're a moron because you can't understand logic and half the time you flat out lie and then deflect when you get called out on it.
And you deflect poorly at that. Kinda like you're trying to deflect from this lame argument you made every time I've called you on it.
You claim Peyton had a great team because they were 12-4 but couldn't win championships because Peyton didn't elevate them to it.
Fine. I'll claim that the Patriots were already a championship team during that 4 year period and Brady didn't elevate them.
I've got perennial 11 win seasons with a 2-14 season for Indy without Peyton and perennial 11 win seasons with another 11 win season without Brady for New England to show that Peyton VASTLY improved his team and Brady didn't.
You have "Super bowl rings" because that's the simplest thing you can wrap your head around when it comes to judging a single player in a team sport.
|
The Pats wouldn't have three Super Bowl rings with Drew Bledsoe. The Colts also went 2-14 with Curtis Painter and Dan Orlovsky. Matt Cassel isn't the greatest, but he's 10x better than those two. The Colts also had half their team on the IR before the bye week. Peyton wouldn't have taken that team to the playoffs if he played. Nobody could have.