Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Guycott
I'm guessing he meant since the debut of Kane... and how long they have been known/associated with eachother. That's been a long time. Remember, WWE are the same people who killed The Major Brothers because "nobody would buy Zack Ryder and Kurt Hawkins as brothers", but were still touting'Taker/Kane as such.
|
You are killing it in this thread. You get what I was going for, alberit maybe not the clearest sense.
There are duos that are synonymous. Austin and the Rock. Flair and Dusty. Flair and Sting.
Guys where their history is long and interwoven and like someone else said, anytime they are together or against each other its special. They have so much history that you can kind of know what they are going to do or how they would react.
the WWE is so bad at that these days. They ignore history so much.
I cant think of any duo that has been consistently booked as they have for 16 years.