Quote:
Originally Posted by The MAC
It seems every news post that concerns TNA is either negative or just plain underwhelming. My question is, can TNA turn it around or have they past the point of no return?
Now with the promosie of Jeff Jarretts new promotion, how will things be any different than WCW or TNA where they buy WWE off casts or hire people most of the general audience has not heard of?
Is WWE just too dominant for any other organization to start up (withouth having an initial 1 Billion)?
|
Really depends on what happens to their tv deal later this year considering the rumors regarding Spike. They've always had the potential of turning things around and/or building on their success but at the same time have also always been their own worst enemy.
On paper, Jarrett's promotion appears to follow advice Heyman offered to TNA years ago in using those early years dedicated to building new young stars for the future unlike TNA. The experience he had with TNA's mismanagement should also be enough to help the new promotion not follow the same mistakes TNA (and WCW) had.
Yes. The WWE at this point is like the NFL in terms of scope and size within the profession. Only reason WCW was able to hang around and be a legit threat was because of Ted Turner's cash and existing legacy with previous promotions.