Thread: Historical Evolution of WWE vs. Recent Historical Trends
View Single Post
Old 07-07-2014, 09:33 PM   #2
Fox
"Ask him!"
 
Fox's Avatar
 
Posts: 10,075
Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)
I definitely know what you mean. I felt the same way when I was using the WWE Network for the first time.

Those others eras are so defined. You can start up IYH: Badd Blood and you know "oh, this is the birth of DX - Austin isn't the man yet, but he's going to be soon - this is pre-screwjob stuff..." You start up TLC 2006 or Summerslam 2007 or Bragging Rights 2008 and it all kind of feels the same - very cookie cutter. "Cena is the man, Edge is the man, there's CM Punk jobbing."

I don't think I summed that up very well, but whatever, fuck you.
Fox is offline   Reply With Quote