Thread: THREE HOUR TIMESLOT IS KILLING RAW—PERIOD
View Single Post
Old 08-13-2014, 09:39 PM   #5
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
I tend to either have Raw on in the background so I can turn my attention to the important bits or watch it afterward and take advantage of fast forward.

Normally 3 hours of wrestling would be fantastic. At another point in time it seems like an extra hour would be an awesome way to push even more talent at once. In theory with all this TV time, there should be more over guys than ever before. Instead... there might be LESS than ever before. Russo's pretty spot on here. It's not treated as a way to focus on more compelling storylines. It's treated as a chore and they just stretch it by giving a bunch of meaningless matches more time.
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote