View Single Post
Old 08-24-2014, 12:08 PM   #40
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by drave View Post
This is the only part I really disagree with, and it isn't because of any opinion of Bryan at all, simply that Kane never seemed like a credible threat whatsoever. I think that is what most are conveying as well.
They built the feud to give Bryan a rub though. You can say Kane wasn't a huge threat as a challenger because of his recent history but they built him up over the preceding month, gave him the mask and the invincible monster character back just to put Bryan over as champion. It makes absolutely no sense to claim that they spent a month building Kane up as a monster again and then having Bryan go over him in an extreme rules match (again... in THE main event where Bryan defending the title was treated as THE main attraction of the card) specifically to derail Bryan's reign and make him look weak. It's just... insane levels of conspiracy theory.
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote