|
TNA genuinely has more going on from top the bottom. They can build a guy within their own universe. A lot of their guys would be nothing in WWE but in TNA they are built to mean something, and for the most part remain that way. Guys like Bully Ray, Bobby Roode, James Storm have all come through the ranks and have been kept strong since making it to the top.
TNA has more storylines across the board, they attempt to make everything/body interesting. Do they hit the target every time? Nope. But it's better than they half-baked, stop-start nature of how WWE book most of their stuff.
Also, their in-ring stuff is better than WWE's for the most part.
I think if people invested a bit of time getting into or "attached" to TNA they might enjoy it more.
On the flip-side, you can't compete with the production value if WWE; everything feels more important. WWE also benefits from years and years of people having affection for the brand. I watched WWF when I was 8, I'm still watching now that I'm 30; it's a part of my life and probably always will be.
Because of that TNA will never compete with WWE, even if their product was legitimately and consistently better.
Personally I don't which I prefer; I enjoy parts of each show.
|