Thread: Terms the IWC has no clue how to use
View Single Post
Old 09-22-2014, 12:44 PM   #61
Ol Dirty Dastard
boop/bop/beep
 
Ol Dirty Dastard's Avatar
 
Posts: 38,453
Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Ol Dirty Dastard makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bad News Gertner View Post
Main Eventer.

The IWC thinks anyone who can wrestle a 4 star match should.be main eventing. Cody Rhodes for example. He's a mid to upper mid card guy. Not a main eventer and there's nothing wrong with that. Everybody has a role. Having a solid undercard only makes the product better.
Cody Rhodes doesn't have a main event shine if you will, but in an actual developed mid card he would be tremendous along with Cesaro and Sheamus as well as Ziggler etc. The problem is there's no god damned focus on the mid card and the story lines are non existent so people want a little more shine on certain guys to make it seem like their favourite wrasslers aren't just there to fill space and time on a 3 hour over booked raw. Thus, they want them in the main event so there can at least be a bit more emphasis on someone they care about. I blame the company more than the fans for this.
Ol Dirty Dastard is offline   Reply With Quote