View Single Post
Old 10-15-2014, 02:06 AM   #22
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlickyTrickyDamon View Post
They need to stick with their choice unless he gets hurt or does something to get suspended. The briefcase being on the line is a cheap selling point.
They need a cheap selling point at this point because the booking alone is not nearly good enough to sell non-title matches for a PPV. And notice how I said " If you're gonna have Rollins win it, put the case on the line." You don't do it as a way to take the case off of him. Do it as a way to make people care about the outcome of the match. I don't like the idea. I'd rather they be able to book a huge, well hyped main event that gives people a reason to pay $55 for. They failed. So they need to find a cheap reason.

Ambrose vs Rollins is a fine match with a pretty good build. Neither guy is a headliner at this point though. Cena and Orton is your main event by default and it just happened for free on Raw not long ago. And it was forgettable. I seriously don't remember the outcome (though it was probably a DQ because... well... Raw.) Throwing a cell over them and having nothing at stake does not take it from forgettable Raw main event to PPV main event.
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote