[#1-norm-fan]

Originally Posted by XL So; First thing, you don't have HHH force the match, you force Seth into a position where he opts to put the case on the line. You emphasise the whole "you're never gonna cash in whilst I'm around" deal, you push the idea that Ambrose is the bane of Rollins' existence. All the while you keep Ambrose from getting a fair one-on-one with Rollns. You get to a point where Rollins has simply had enough to the point where he says "What have I gotta do to get rid of him!?" Ambrose answers this; "you want me to go away? Simple. Me, you, one-on-one. If you win, I go away, I leave you alone, you cash in. But if I win...I get the case". Rollins deliberates but decides that as long as Ambrose is around the case is valueless because he'll always stop him cashing in. The chance to get Ambrose off his back is worth the risk of the case. You can go either way here. Ambrose finally gets his fair one-on-one, he wins and takes possession of the case. Or, Seth wins - lets say with assistance - but you can still have Ambrose causing him trouble and sell it on a "you didn't keep your word (on the fair one-on-one) so I'm not keeping mine". Or Seth wins clean and Ambrose still sticks his nose in, breaking his word because he's a face in the WWE so he can be an asshole.

See. Another fine idea they could use to make it make sense. Shouldn't be much of a problem for professional writers.