Thread: Was the Invasion always destined to fail?
View Single Post
Old 10-20-2014, 12:34 PM   #4
whiteyford
Out Of Step
 
whiteyford's Avatar
 
Posts: 12,059
whiteyford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)whiteyford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)whiteyford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)whiteyford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)whiteyford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)whiteyford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)whiteyford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)whiteyford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)whiteyford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)whiteyford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)whiteyford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)whiteyford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)whiteyford makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
The biggest stars they brought over were DDP and Booker, if they weren't prepared to shell out to secure the bigger names it was always going to look second rate. Add to that the Alliance never really looked dominant, even after they added Austin, there's been enough invasion angles in recent memory that they should of known better.
whiteyford is offline   Reply With Quote