Thread: Smackdown SPOILERS - 5th of July 2013 Edition **Now Updated with 10/31/14 Spoilers**
View Single Post
Old 10-29-2014, 12:21 AM   #40
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
I'm speaking on the booking strategy in general more than Ziggler specifically. The whole idea of the champion losing on a nearly weekly basis in order to make him look weak for an upcoming match is ridiculous. It's been happening for years now. Not just the midcard titles either. It happened with Punk when he was champion.

Los Matadores beating Goldust and Stardust might actually be a better example.
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote