Thread: Brock Lesnar, the title, and WrestleMania
View Single Post
Old 11-06-2014, 09:03 AM   #1
mike adamle
His name is Jeff Harvey
 
mike adamle's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,256
mike adamle has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)mike adamle has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)mike adamle has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)mike adamle has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)mike adamle has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)mike adamle has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)mike adamle has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)mike adamle has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)mike adamle has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)mike adamle has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)
Brock Lesnar, the title, and WrestleMania
I keep hearing all these scenarios about who should beat Brock Lesnar this year at WrestleMania 31.

I feel like it'd be great if Lesnar retains the title at WrestleMania. For months now everyone has been saying that Roman Reigns (or a long shot Daniel Bryan) should be the one to take the title off of Brock at Mania to get that Mania moment.

But in my opinion there isn't anyone even close to ready to take that belt off of Lesnar right now. Why not let him keep it for a while and make the person who takes it off of him get a meaningful win instead of "well it's mania and someone needs a moment."

Imagine if Lesnar keeps the belt until Mania 32 and keeps wrestling his limited schedule. People will be craving someone (who is hopefully built up enough by then) to take the belt off of him.

Anyone agree?

Stand in the face of adversity!
mike adamle is offline   Reply With Quote