View Single Post
Old 11-19-2014, 01:20 PM   #28
screech
Shelly Martinez = Ratings
 
screech's Avatar
 
Posts: 23,625
screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)screech makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDXArmy3Life View Post
I've grown out of it, and it no longer excites me as much as it did during the attitude era. Apart from looking forward to the WWE Network launch here in the United Kingdom I was once again shocked that we got screwed.

Vince could have still launched the Network, but just not have allowed us to view ppv and raw/smackdown events.. Or gave Sky a percentage towards the in takes of the Network.. anyone agree.?
Hello, TheDXArmy3Life. Welcome to TPWW. I agree that WWE really f'd up with the UK Network, and given the low numbers they should have done more to get the full version over there. I'm not sure blocking live PPVs would have worked, though, as that's a pretty big selling point.

As a followup, what would entice you to watch wrestling again? A weekly Screech Around™ featuring WWE Paige and Renee Young, perhaps?
screech is offline   Reply With Quote