View Single Post
Old 07-09-2004, 08:21 PM   #16
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
WTF @ Ebert. He liked the movie and all but in his review he was like "Hoping to attract Corningstone, Ron Burgundy splashes on a high-octane cologne that smells, the newsroom agrees, 'like the time the raccoon got in the copier.'"

That wasn't Ron Burgundy. How is he reviewing a movie that he liked yet he can't remember a major detail like that correctly.
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote