As far as the "Enough bad mouthing the WWE" and such, I don't agree with you.
As a consumer, a person who puts time and money into the product, it is my "right*" as a consumer to critize it as a see fit. As a human, it is my "right*" to make fun of it as I see fit. I watch the product, buy its merchandise, attend its shows, and if I don't feel it or its workers are at a quality best suited for me, I feel I have the "right*" to critize it.
Why all the posts making fun of Hunter and Henry, as you exampled? Because Hunter (among others) use backstage politics that normally hurt the show. Henry, on the other hand, is just an aweful wrestler, he takes up airtime that could be given to something more interesting, and may have a higher chance of hurting someone.
I'm not a fan of the Roster Split when it first began, but I have no reall care on it. I'd personally like to see more matches and workings between different wrestlers, but so would others.
Titles altogether have no purpose, but it is the company's job, writers, workers, etc, to make it look credible. They don't do that, and they kill it off.
Feuds and turns and the likes. Honestly, RVD, Maven, Jericho, etc. Unless they get a MEGA Turn/Feud/Push, they're dead. As much as some people want to not say it, Jericho is dead if this current story doesn't go through 110%. I think the WWE, though, should have started paying attention to skills in the ring, before trying to make another Rock or Austin. Thank God for Cena and Orton...
Eh, during these years, I really watched WCW and ECW. I never cared for the Attitude Era as much, just because it normally was more gimmick than matches. But it was a good few years, and had ALOT of great things, just as it did bad.
I think you don't understand some of the complaints. People only complain because they want things better, not because they want to rag it. Everyone thinks their ideas would help, and alot of times they most likely would. We want the best for a company we put time and money in, not for it to go and pull a WCW or ECW on us.
* It's an individual right. I can't sit here and say that "We have the right too," because that isn't true. Lack of better term I guess.
|