Thread: Should each WWE performer have a "off season"
View Single Post
Old 11-28-2014, 08:27 PM   #1
Bad News Gertner
Best Poster
 
Bad News Gertner's Avatar
 
Posts: 57,049
Bad News Gertner makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Bad News Gertner makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Bad News Gertner makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Bad News Gertner makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Bad News Gertner makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Bad News Gertner makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Bad News Gertner makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Bad News Gertner makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Bad News Gertner makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Bad News Gertner makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Bad News Gertner makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Bad News Gertner makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Bad News Gertner makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Should each WWE performer have a "off season"
In the wake of the CM Punk fall out, do you think each performer have a guaranteed amount of time off, be it a full month a year whether they are hurt or not, or perhaps x amount of days off.

It would may focus writers to actually plan shit out well in advance, with the downside being that you won't have another year long title run. It'd give the wrestlers time to heal mentally and physically.












Quote:
Originally Posted by Triple A View Post
Just cause you turn 40 doesn't mean you can't post cocks and talk about jacking off to porno... age is but a number..
Bad News Gertner is offline   Reply With Quote