Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercenary
Anyone saying Punk didn't deserve to be in the main event of a Wrestlemania. Lets not forget this was the company that had Miz main event at 27.....
|
He did deserve to main event mania but not at that time given that Cena v Rock II was always destined to be on the card and the only way to portray the rematch as being bigger was to have the title on the line.
Personally I'm not a fan of anything other than one on one title match at Wrestlemania (for the WWE title). It is the company's flagship show, their Super Bowl, World Cup final etc etc. as it were and it's only fair that the number one guy at that time i.e. the champ, should defend against the best challenger and both share the limelight together.
The title match at WM should AWAYS be what it was meant to be, the champ vs the RR winner. Adding extra competitors for me just diminishes the significance of winning the Royal Rumble and indeed the Royal Rumble match itself.