Thread: Question of the Week: Who should have won Superstar of the Year?
View Single Post
Old 12-15-2014, 03:18 PM   #3
Big Vic
( ._.)
 
Big Vic's Avatar
 
Posts: 14,257
Big Vic makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Big Vic makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Big Vic makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Big Vic makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Big Vic makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Big Vic makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Big Vic makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Big Vic makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Big Vic makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Big Vic makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Big Vic makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Big Vic makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Big Vic makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
It shouldn’t be Daniel Bryan since He hasn’t wrestled since Extreme Rules.
It shouldn’t be Roman since He hasn’t wrestled since the summer.
It shouldn’t be CM Punk since He hasn’t wrestled since January.
It shouldn’t be Billy Gunn since He hasn’t wrestled since Wrestlemania.

Orton was boring most of the year.
John Cena is a huge forced douche-nozzle.
Ambrose is a contender but recently he’s been losing all of his big matches.
Bray started off good but his losses to Cena and then his feud with Jericho brought him way down.
Brock is having a great year but only shows up 10% of the time.

Rusev could be quite the superstar of the year but I would have to say that Seth Rollins edges him out….Not sure if anyone had a better year than Seth.
Big Vic is offline   Reply With Quote