Thread: DISCUSSION - Unofficial WWE "Rating" System of Wrestlers
View Single Post
Old 02-19-2015, 03:00 PM   #40
Simple Fan
Let me talk to ya
 
Simple Fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,749
Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heyman View Post
One guy who I thought had 4.0, maybe even 4.5, potential was Daniel Puder.


If you recall, Puder absolutely dominated Tough Enough 4 and was way over with the fans. This was at a time when UFC/MMA was starting to hit main-stream due to the Ken Shamrock/Tito Ortiz shenanigans. Puder also put Kurt Angle in the Kimura lock.


It's too bad that Puder couldn't contain his ego and "play ball" so to speak. Had Puder played ball and paid his dues, I think he could have won the World/WWE title post 2006...........a time period in which the WWE was very stale and was dying for new and emerging talent.
He tried to break Kurt's arm and make a name for himself, If WWE would have went with the Angle/Puder fued he would have had a good chance at a decent career but I don't think Kurt would have done it.
Simple Fan is offline   Reply With Quote