Thread: DISCUSSION - Unofficial WWE "Rating" System of Wrestlers
View Single Post
Old 02-19-2015, 05:00 PM   #46
Heyman
Father of Hinduship
 
Heyman's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,083
Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruien View Post
I would put Joe at a 3.0 yellow. No way Joe would go on to win multiple world titles. He is a solid talent but not close to main event status.

I agree with this completely. I think the same rating of 3.0 would be applicable to someone like A.J. Styles as well (although like Samoa Joe, I haven't seen A.J. wrestle either).


With only One World title now, it's going to be a lot tougher for wrestlers to advance beyond the 3.0 level. Most of those 3.5 guys that I have listed, likely would not have become World champions had their been only 1 belt.


Perhaps that is a good 'litmus' test in determining a true 4.0 wrestler (i.e. if there had only been 1 World/WWE title, would that guy have become a World/WWE champion?). By this definition, guys like Kane and Big Show would be promoted to 4.0'ers, and Mick Foley would be listed at this level as well.
Heyman is offline   Reply With Quote