Thread: Did the right guy win?
View Single Post
Old 02-24-2015, 07:36 AM   #34
drave
 
drave's Avatar
 
Posts: 25,602
drave makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)drave makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)drave makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)drave makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)drave makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)drave makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)drave makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)drave makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)drave makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)drave makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)drave makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)drave makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)drave makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlickyTrickyDamon View Post
WM9 is the worst ending to a WrestleMania ever with Hogan winning the title robbing Bret and Yoko of their moment. Not sure why they would want to bring that back at WrestleMania. There hasn't been a cash in at WrestleMania for a reason. It might be because they don't think they had the right person yet. Or it's because they don't want to taint WrestleMania in that manner.
A cash in at Mania would have made sense if Bryan were going over Lesnar. I say that because it would then cement Rollins as THE heel of the this generation. He would be so passionately hated that he would possibly need an actual security detail. WWE needs a heel at that level of heat rather than just a "RAWR, I BEAT YOU NOW!" big fella. Rollins is almost there, people already dislike his character, but something is still missing.

Him cashing in on Reigns OR Lesnar is very uneventful in my mind. I could see Reigns going over and Rollins cashing in on Reigns, but it isn't going to garner the reaction it could if the people actually gave a shit about the WM main event in the first place. I could also see them doing that to try to get more crowd support for Reigns.

Cashing in on Lesnar is just..... well, seems boring to me.
drave is offline   Reply With Quote