Quote:
Originally Posted by Damian Rey
In the grand scheme of things, Lesnar beating Taker and going on as the most dominant dominant heel champion in ages has gone a long way, imo.
|
I don't think it has to be honest. He doesn't appear dominant well to me anyways because the fact his dominance streak has continued is due to the fact he is hardly around. If he was there week in week out it'd be a different story.
I maintain had WWE known Sting was going to sign they'd have allowed Taker to get the win over Lesnar to set up Sting v Undertaker for WM31.
I'm not a Lesnar fan so my bias against is obvious. But the loss has tarnished Undertaker's legacy imo and whether that's to do with backroom politics etc who knows.
It was the one thing he had that made him special compared to other ring legends. Now he is just like all the others.