View Single Post
Old 03-16-2015, 07:43 PM   #14199
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
I just had a random thought about last year's WrestleMania. So... a lot of Daniel Bryan marks hated the fact that he feuded with Kane in his first feud because it felt "minor" or whatever.

I was thinking, would it have been better if they re-hashed the WrestleMania 10 story of Bret/Owen? Instead of Bryan asking for a match with Triple H in which he gets to be in the title match if he wins, what if he just... asks for a match with Triple H? Triple H wins with via a mercelessly beating him with a sledgehammer while the ref is out cold. Internet goes crazy with "Fuck Triple H" hate. Bryan miraculously comes back and wins the title at the end of the night. All is well. Triple H says he's clearly the only man who can stop this nonsense and we get Triple H vs Bryan at Extreme Rules for the title. I didn't mind the Kane storyline but looking back, I'm thinking that might have been a better story.
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote