Thread: Rumoured Direction Of The Mid-Card Titles
View Single Post
Old 03-22-2015, 09:38 PM   #75
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
They apparently want the IC Title to mean something, yet they ended the Barrett vs. Ambrose match at Fast Lane with a disqualification? Why not shift the title to Ambrose and have Barrett chase Ambrose in a feud that matters? Or why not have Ambrose simply earn the IC Title shot at Fast Lane and have Barrett attack him after the match? Everything rings a little bit hollow right now.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote