Thread: Is there an element of homoeroticism to WWE's odd obsession with big men?
View Single Post
Old 03-30-2015, 01:54 AM   #46
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
I think calling "homo" when bigger wrestlers get favored over smaller ones is a bit homoerotic. Seems like a weird place for a straight dude's mind to go to. "I like smaller wrestlers." "Nah. I prefer bigger wrestlers." "IS THAT BECAUSE BIG WRESTLERS ARE SUPER HOT AND BONER-INDUCING, YOU HOMO?"
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote