Thread: Is there an element of homoeroticism to WWE's odd obsession with big men?
View Single Post
Old 03-30-2015, 04:54 PM   #61
The Mask
That Entenbrot, The Mask
 
The Mask's Avatar
 
Posts: 56,852
The Mask makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)The Mask makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)The Mask makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)The Mask makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)The Mask makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)The Mask makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)The Mask makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)The Mask makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)The Mask makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)The Mask makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)The Mask makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)The Mask makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)The Mask makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heyman View Post
I think it revolves around credibility and realism.


I think that's why the WWE has reservations about having a guy like Daniel Bryan being "the face" of the WWE. In Vince's eyes, it makes the WWE look weak by having a small guy being billed as 'better' than everyone else. It also makes the WWE look even more 'fake' by doing so (i.e. Daniel Bryan can 'beat up' guys like Big Show, Kane, Rusev, and Lesnar).
Pretty much. I think you'd have to make a small guy more wily in order to give credibility. A small face is hard to accept whereas a small heel can cheat 2 win.
The Mask is offline   Reply With Quote