Thread: MLB Thread
View Single Post
Old 04-26-2015, 04:09 PM   #1927
Evil Vito
President of Freedonia
 
Evil Vito's Avatar
 
Posts: 58,273
Evil Vito makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Evil Vito makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Evil Vito makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Evil Vito makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Evil Vito makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Evil Vito makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Evil Vito makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Evil Vito makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Evil Vito makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Evil Vito makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Evil Vito makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Evil Vito makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Evil Vito makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Although this has no chance of happening, my solution would be to eliminate the DH league-wide and expand the rosters to 27 players. The union would need a damn good reason to agree to eliminating the DH, so this proposal would placate them by creating 60 new jobs league wide.

I figure in this scenario most teams would carry an extra relief pitcher and then a 6 man bench. Those older guys who can still hit but not do much else can still be saved as a lethal bat for late in the game. In the modern NL it's tough to keep a one-dimensional player like that around as a pinch-hit specialist since, again, NL baseball behooves a team to have a diverse, flexible bench.

Owners might not be happy about having to pay 2 more guys a Major League salary, but budgets may still go down with the high-paying DH job gone. The teams that would have a big issue with it are the Tigers, Yankees, etc. who have high paid DHs who pretty much can't field anymore and now there'd be nowhere for them to play.
Evil Vito is offline