Thread: Should the NXT title be defended at the big 4 PPVs?
View Single Post
Old 05-25-2015, 11:56 PM   #10
Evil Vito
President of Freedonia
 
Evil Vito's Avatar
 
Posts: 58,383
Evil Vito makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Evil Vito makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Evil Vito makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Evil Vito makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Evil Vito makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Evil Vito makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Evil Vito makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Evil Vito makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Evil Vito makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Evil Vito makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Evil Vito makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Evil Vito makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Evil Vito makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noid View Post
Hmm, I dunno. I'm happy with NXT getting the sort of exposure it is. Maybe have some more talent work "one-off" to dip their toes in the water -- ie. Becky Lynch and Sasha Banks appearing as partners for Paige and Naomi in a tag match or something -- but I don't think we need the title defended out of NXT. If you want that title, you have to step into the realm NXT provides.
I pretty much agree with this. I'd especially be against having it defended at WrestleMania. WWE has been very poor in the area of time management for Mania as it is and usually wind up cramming 80% of their main roster into clusterfuck matches at the biggest show of the year. Trying to shoehorn a NXT Title match onto an already packed card would probably be more of a hindrance than anything else and wouldn't do the talent in the match justice, since the match time would likely need to be cut short.

If they DID feel the need to do it at a Big 4 PPV, I'd advocate doing it as a hot opener for the main Royal Rumble card since most of the "big names" will be in the Rumble itself anyway. But I'd rather keep it on NXT.
Evil Vito is offline   Reply With Quote