Thread: If not Roman Reigns, then who?
View Single Post
Old 07-26-2015, 08:05 PM   #100
Heyman
Father of Hinduship
 
Heyman's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,083
Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Good above post CyNick.


The only thing with Lesnar is that there's no way that the WWE can constantly have him be a part-time champ. I do like the idea of building up Owens over the next 1.5 years so that he's ready to be champ by Wrestlemania 33, but I also think someone needs to cleanly and convincingly go over Lesnar well before then (Wrestlemania 32), so that the WWE has a legit 'alpha star' to carry the company on a full-time basis.


My vote would go towards Ambrose or Orton as you know. Ideally, it would be Ambrose because he's not 'saturated' (been around for too long) like Orton, but the WWE seem content in holding him down for whatever reason.


If the WWE can salvage anything out of this year, it would be in giving both Dean Ambrose and Bray Wyatt very significant pushes and victories over main-event calibre wrestlers in feuds this year. I feel that if Ambrose and Wyatt don't make significant strides this year, then their "window" for becoming a massive star will likely close, and they will go into Sheamus/The Miz/Dolph Ziggler territory.
Heyman is offline   Reply With Quote