Thread: If not Roman Reigns, then who?
View Single Post
Old 07-27-2015, 10:56 AM   #32
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
I'm in the camp of people who don't think that Wyatt needs to win every match. The guy's got a Mick Foley-like ability to take a loss and shrug it off. He could just laugh maniacally and say "Is that what you've got?" and all is forgiven. That being said, I really think the guy would have been the best choice to win Money in the Bank this year. He'd be creepy looming over everything with the briefcase, and it'd add a lot to this Reigns vs. Wyatt feud, as Wyatt would be in a true position of power.

That being said, I don't know what their full plans are with Sheamus and the briefcase.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote