View Single Post
Old 07-27-2015, 10:38 PM   #187
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lock Jaw View Post
I do like that Sasha winning gives it that kind of "anybody can win" kind of feeling....

One of the things I enjoyed way back in the day when I actually watched and enjoyed TNA (ie, when Christian was there), was that in a lot of matches you couldn't tell who was going to win a lot of the time, and that a lot of them were presented as being in a "clusterf*** of equality"...
Those matches are more effective when two guys are on a warpath and then collide in a "who can keep it up?" type of match.

When everyone seems like they can beat everyone else, no one gets over. It's like "Cool. You beat that guy. But you lost to him last week, beat the guy who beat him the week before and lost to the guy who lost to the guy who beat the guy who beat him the week before. Who gives a shit about the outcome of your match next week now? You're clearly not gaining or losing anything from it."
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote