View Single Post
Old 07-18-2004, 10:41 PM   #30
Heyman
Father of Hinduship
 
Heyman's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,083
Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThugLife
Yeah what annoys me is people think too much of how to make Raw better when it has enough stars as it is, instead of making Smackdown better. Do note that by taking big stars off of Smackdown like Guerrero,angle and Taker, you would be making the same mistake as the writers have....
I see what you're saying (and I admit - I am guilty as charged when it comes to being biased towards Raw.....as I didn't get Smackdown this past year).

I guess from where I sit - it just doesn't make sense to have your top heel on Raw, while the two largest faces are on Smackdown (three if you count Undertaker).

As CyNick pointed out, "depth" isn't what gets people to watch shows. Ultimately - it's the top stars which draw. I guess I got a bit pre-occupied with getting Triple H an opponent.

Still - even if Guerrero OR Cena go to Raw, Smackdown would still have Guerrero or Cena (one or the other), alongside Taker. Also - if my idea went into effect, they'd still be getting Edge (along side Taijiri, Rhyno, and Nidia). Edge still has potential to a solid main-eventer.
Heyman is offline   Reply With Quote