Thread: would the wwe be wise to take a ppv off?
View Single Post
Old 08-27-2015, 06:27 PM   #5
Emperor Smeat
Former TPWW Royalty
 
Emperor Smeat's Avatar
 
Posts: 66,665
Emperor Smeat makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Emperor Smeat makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Emperor Smeat makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Emperor Smeat makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Emperor Smeat makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Emperor Smeat makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Emperor Smeat makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Emperor Smeat makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Emperor Smeat makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Emperor Smeat makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Emperor Smeat makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Emperor Smeat makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Emperor Smeat makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Should get rid of the 1-2 ppvs that only get 2 weeks of building because of scheduling reasons.

WWE likes to do 13 ppvs normally because it breaks down well into the 4 week model for builds but the problem is they also like to give the Rumble and/or Mania extra weeks which causes later ppvs to be rushed for builds.
Emperor Smeat is offline   Reply With Quote