Thread: would the wwe be wise to take a ppv off?
View Single Post
Old 08-31-2015, 10:47 AM   #16
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
They should probably do more to make the Network more special. Obviously you don't want to burn-out your fanbase, but I don't really see how cutting down on big events during a month is going to attract people to a PPV you are selling monthly subscriptions to. I wouldn't be purposely running anymore shows, but I think they should be finding ways to make them special and get them on the WWE Network (like the Madison Square Garden show).

They could probably run Night of Champions with just the title matches that the PPV name implies, and then do a different network special with your more personal matches stemming from the PPV -- John Cena & Sting vs. Triple H & Seth Rollins; Reigns, Ambrose & partner vs. The Wyatt Family; Ziggler vs. Rusev; Lana vs. Summer; etc.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote