Thread: Some Facts about the year of 2004 for the WWE
View Single Post
Old 07-19-2004, 06:45 PM   #19
Xero
He's Here
 
Xero's Avatar
 
Posts: 60,735
Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Xero makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mayo
Those guys in the Rumble aren't main eventers because they only do it once a year. I was defining what a main event was, not a main eventer. Main eventers compete in main events regularly and on a consistent basis.

Taker/Dudleyz shouldn't have been the last match, but the Smackdown booking is fucked. Another reason that they possibly had Taker/Dudleys as the last match is because Bearer 'died' at the end, so they needed to have that big effect at the end of the show. It would also be really hard to clean up and stuff if it happened as the second last match.
Very true...

Ive noticed that sometimes on Raw (Not PPV, but still), they have the billed main event as the "main event" for the first hour, then have something else as the actual main event...

I dunno how they do it now (Havent gone to one in a while), but at House Shows they used to do the same... I remember Taker, when he was big (98-99?), as the match before intermission, then another match, not billed as the main event, go on last...
Xero is offline   Reply With Quote