|
I just get the odd feeling that whether Snuka is actually guilty or not that there's such a huge chance that a lot of the prosecution's case may rest on circumstantial evidence and possibly witnesses called that may not be completely credible after 32 long years, that any Grand Jury in the land might well find themselves hard pressed not to return a not guilty verdict or to not return from deliberations as a hung jury.
I'm not saying I know exactly what evidence and witnesses and possibly experts might be shown by the defense and the prosecution. I'm saying IMHO that I think from the outset of the trial the huge burden of proof will rest squarely on the prosecution's shoulders. I could be wrong. But one thing I do know is this: it will be one HELL of an intriguing trial.
|