Quote:
Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan
Literally my only problem with the brand split was 2 world titles. It does water down the "moment" of winning the title when instead of it signifying you're THE guy, it just signifies you're "one of the guys". There should always be one top champion. You can raise the IC and US titles to signify dominance on a specific brand and then let the World Champion go back and forth defending it between brands. Having a "WWE" and a "World" championship was always just silly.
|
I actually agree completely on that. Having one world title with the secondary titles being the top titles for their brands would work perfectly. The tag-team division isn't big enough to warrant two sets, and neither is the divas belt. I'd say split up the titles so that each brand feels "unique". RAW can have the IC and divas titles while SD gets the US and tag-team belts. People will have a reason to watch Smackdown then because it'll be the only place to see tag-teams competing for the gold, and RAW will be the only place to see the girls go at it. Or do it the other way around, whatever. If you could give Smackdown it's own unique feel the way they have NXT then there's no reason a brand split couldn't work. The problem with Smackdown toward the end of the brand split and now is that it's basically just RAW light with 70% recaps.