Quote:
Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan
When it was on Lesnar it was definitely gaining credibility again. Like I said, I'd rather it be on a part-time spectacle at this point rather than it being what it is now. Putting it on far lesser guys with no credibility and crossing their fingers is definitely counter-productive.
Plus, if there's ever a time to use the title to just give a guy like Sting a reign it would be now when he can actually bring up the prestige as opposed to taking it from someone like Cena or Lesnar.
|
Problem is look what happened the second the belt was off Lesnar. Sure it seemed like a big deal when he had it, but no one could have ever lived up to the hype when they beat him for it unless they themselves were a mega star like he is.
Of course this all comes back to the fact that WWE doesn't know how to book properly anymore. If they were to keep the belt on a guy like Lesnar for a couple years maybe, or bring in a couple of big names to feud with him over those few years they could then have everyone else fighting for the secondary titles. All of this would however require WWE to actually put effort into those smaller feuds and actually write compelling storylines.