Thread: Having Part Timers Losers
View Single Post
Old 09-21-2015, 03:12 PM   #9
Simple Fan
Let me talk to ya
 
Simple Fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 11,749
Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Simple Fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Having part timers lose is not the problem. They should be there to put over younger talent. But in Stings case it does him no good to put guys over without doing anything in WWE. What does Rollins gain from beating a guy that lost to HHH at Mania. If Sting beat HHH he would be a legit title contender instead of just placing in a WWE title match. Now Rollins loses to Cena and beats a guy that has never won a singles match in WWE. What good did it do for Rollins? He should have either left with both titles or none at all.
Simple Fan is offline   Reply With Quote