Quote:
Originally Posted by The CyNick
WWE didnt both Dave's return, the fans just liked Bryan more, and wrongfully expected Bryan to return in the Rumble match. If WWE was so against Bryan, why keep him in main angles on TV, why not just push him down the card. He was working with HHH and Steph THE ENTIRE road to Mania. Clearly they were going somewhere with him, and clearly he was a central part of the storyline.
So why do you think WWE continues to be so successful if the product is so crap? Ever think maybe you're tastes are not aligned with the product, and you should just stop watching the product? So many people like you complain and complain, and yet you have a pretty vivid memory of every angle and match. Its like you're complaining because you think its the right thing to do. Surely if something annoyed you that much you would quit watching. Or maybe you just prefer being miserable.
|
I pick and choose what I watch on the internet, and do not contribute to their pay-per-views or raw ratings... largely because I'm a wrestling fan and not a WWE fan. If I see something is good, I make a point to find and watch. If I turn on RAW for 5 minutes, it's usually shit and I turn it off. And I don't prefer being miserable because I watch tons of wrestling still, and enjoy the fuck out of it.... it just happens to be matches from 2 decades ago for the most part which I'm lucky enough with todays technology to be able to watch.
The reason why the WWE is successful is the same reason the Simpsons is successful, resting on their laurels from back when the put forth a superior product, and surviving on being a brand more than a good product. WWE is the only real game in town, and their closest competition is TNA and let's not get into that mess.